axbom’s Twitter Archive—№ 23,887

"What does the research say?" When people repeatedly ask this it seems they are asking "What are the facts?". But shouldn't they also ask: * Who paid for the research? * Who performed the research? * Who was part of the research? * Has it been replicated? 🤔
On twitter.com ♻️ 405 Retweets ❤️ 1,017 Favorites 2018 Jan 26 Mood 0

…in reply to @axbom
Really long podcast but so many good nuggets on bad science in the medical field, on the "10,000-Hour Rule", training and also parenting. An interview with David Epstein, Author of Range and The Sports Gene. overcast.fm/+NmiSH8ZM8
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 4 Favorites 2020 Mar 9 Mood 0
…in reply to @axbom
In 2010 the term "replication crisis" was coined when scientists kept finding that the results of many scientific studies are difficult or impossible to replicate/reproduce on subsequent investigation, either by independent researchers or by the original researchers themselves.[
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 23 Retweets ❤️ 134 Favorites 2018 Jan 26 Mood -4 🙁

…in reply to @axbom
Here's the Wikipedia article on that term, replication crisis. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 4 Retweets ❤️ 51 Favorites 2018 Jan 26 Mood -3 🙁

…in reply to @axbom
Here's an interesting article from 2015 regarding this phenomenon: Scientists Replicated 100 Psychology Studies, and Fewer Than Half Got the Same Results smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/scientists-replicated-100-psychology-studies-and-fewer-half-got-same-results-180956426/
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 25 Retweets ❤️ 108 Favorites 2018 Jan 26 Mood +2 🙂

…in reply to @axbom
Although all scientific fields are under scrutiny, psychology is at the center of the controversy and social psychology specifically.
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 6 Retweets ❤️ 74 Favorites 2018 Jan 26 Mood -2 🙁

…in reply to @axbom
I find this interesting because I attend conferences where many of these popularised social psychology experiments are at the heart of the message from many speakers providing advice on how to design for humans.
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 6 Retweets ❤️ 87 Favorites 2018 Jan 26 Mood +2 🙂

…in reply to @axbom
My fear is that designers place too much trust in the work of others, essentially drawing conclusions about how to design - based on studies that can not be replicated. Thus turning the design itself into a huge [unethical] social experiment... That's all for now. :)
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 16 Retweets ❤️ 115 Favorites 2018 Jan 26 Mood 0

…in reply to @axbom
The oft-quoted ”nudge” example of making hotel plates smaller to make people consume less food is dangerous because: 1) It assumes all people should consume less. 2) It does not follow R_Thaler’s rule of transparency. 3) It is also wrong. theconversation.com/do-smaller-plates-make-you-eat-less-no-74181
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 23 Retweets ❤️ 94 Favorites 2018 Jan 27 Mood -4 🙁

…in reply to @axbom
It turns out all the studies claiming small plates lead to less consumption come from the same research group, one that happens to be under scrutiny for self-plagiariam and data misrepresentation. theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2017/mar/02/fresh-concerns-raised-over-academic-conduct-of-major-us-nutrition-and-behaviour-lab
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 23 Retweets ❤️ 99 Favorites 2018 Jan 27 Mood -2 🙁

…in reply to @axbom
I am however confident I will, for many years to come, witness speakers on stage claiming the plate - consumption causation and then using that as evidence of some unrelated design solution being the way to go.
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 3 Retweets ❤️ 70 Favorites 2018 Jan 27 Mood +3 🙂

…in reply to @axbom
Another important article, this time on medical science: Evidence-Based Lies. medium.com/@BlakeGossard/evidence-based-lies-1ec8db16cc8a?source=linkShare-77d3f63ebe80-1521827685
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 20 Retweets ❤️ 100 Favorites 2018 Mar 23 Mood +2 🙂

…in reply to @axbom
Noteworthy quote from this article. ”News headlines abound proclaiming that new “data” support this or that position. In many cases, these “data” are derived from surveys, which are highly susceptible to basically every bias known to science.”
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 17 Retweets ❤️ 88 Favorites 2018 Mar 23 Mood +1 🙂

…in reply to @axbom
Another one for the mix, on the lack of insights about cross-cultural psychology and on the dangers of assuming human traits are global and ageless. ht letterpress_se theconversation.com/how-knowledge-about-different-cultures-is-shaking-the-foundations-of-psychology-92696?utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#link_time=1520615158
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 22 Retweets ❤️ 92 Favorites 2018 Mar 25 Mood -2 🙁

…in reply to @axbom
The problem with Science. Good podcast from guardianscience weekly. overcast.fm/+F8mLIo2DM
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 5 Retweets ❤️ 41 Favorites 2018 Mar 30 Mood +1 🙂

…in reply to @axbom
Another must-listen podcast A Neuroscientist Explains: psychology’s replication crisis overcast.fm/+MFGeMgJbg
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 6 Retweets ❤️ 40 Favorites 2018 Mar 30 Mood -3 🙁

…in reply to @axbom
It’s safe to say that the field of psychology has some cleaning up to do: ”Professor Philip Zimbardo used the media to turn his Stanford Prison Experiment into the best-known psychology study of all time. It was a sham.” medium.com/@benzblum/the-lifespan-of-a-lie-d869212b1f62?source=linkShare-77d3f63ebe80-1529466849
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 35 Retweets ❤️ 110 Favorites 2018 Jun 20 Mood -1 🙁

…in reply to @axbom
Another listening recommendation. ”The marshmallow test is one of the most well-known studies in all of psychology, but a new replication suggests we've been learning the wrong lesson from its findings for decades.” overcast.fm/+CuhumMpu4
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 12 Retweets ❤️ 69 Favorites 2018 Jul 5 Mood -2 🙁

…in reply to @axbom
Please listen to this episode of Radiolab with a walkthrough of the famous Milgram experiments. In this case it's not about poorly performed experiments but many years of misinterpretation (over-simplification). overcast.fm/+J5QRFk ht jocke
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 8 Retweets ❤️ 58 Favorites 2018 Jul 30 Mood +1 🙂

…in reply to @axbom
Boom. 800 scientists call for scrapping the concept of 'statistical significance'. nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00857-9 via cjforms
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 10 Retweets ❤️ 55 Favorites 2019 Mar 22 Mood 0

…in reply to @axbom
It appears in sociology, criminology and psychology textbooks, and in the media as a truism – but what if we take a closer look at the research around "the bystander effect"? aeon.co/essays/it-looks-like-human-beings-might-be-good-samaritans-after-all?utm_source=Aeon+Newsletter&utm_campaign=9cf68716e1-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_03_28_12_17&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_411a82e59d-9cf68716e1-70597045
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 10 Retweets ❤️ 41 Favorites 2019 Mar 29 Mood 0

…in reply to @axbom
The replication crisis is good for science. We just need to acknowledge it and talk about it more. theconversation.com/the-replication-crisis-is-good-for-science-103736
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 10 Retweets ❤️ 49 Favorites 2019 May 7 Mood 0

…in reply to @axbom
Bystander Effect debunked lisaehlin/1147818230687420416?s=21
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 4 Retweets ❤️ 35 Favorites 2019 Jul 7 Mood 0

…in reply to @axbom
More on the weaknesses of the bystander effect (paywall): wsj.com/articles/bystanders-who-intervene-in-an-attack-11563464806
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 4 Retweets ❤️ 24 Favorites 2019 Jul 27 Mood -2 🙁

…in reply to @axbom
axbom/1155012406172626944?s=21
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 2 Retweets ❤️ 20 Favorites 2019 Jul 27 Mood 0

…in reply to @axbom
axbom/1203314828426829829?s=21
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 7 Retweets ❤️ 26 Favorites 2019 Dec 7 Mood 0

…in reply to @axbom
Backfire effect. That's when people's opinions are contradicted by facts, but the opinion doesn't change - instead it only grows stronger. But this review suggests the backfire effect is in fact quite rare, and not the norm. fullfact.org/blog/2019/mar/does-backfire-effect-exist/
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 2 Retweets ❤️ 6 Favorites 2019 Dec 13 Mood +2 🙂

…in reply to @axbom
If you clench a pencil between your teeth, this will force a smile that makes you feel more positive emotions. Hmmm. But will it really? A registered replication report (RRR) appears to debunk this common notion from social psychology. theeconomyofmeaning.com/2016/08/20/famous-psychology-study-killed-by-replication-does-a-pencil-in-your-mouth-make-you-feel-happy/
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 7 Favorites 2020 Jan 5 Mood +4 🙂

…in reply to @axbom
axbom/977479576849993728?s=21 axbom/977479576849993728
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 2 Favorites 2020 Jan 5 Mood 0

…in reply to @axbom
People set goals to walk 10,000 steps today because a Japanese watch company in the 1960s made the wearable step-counter manpo-kei, which translates as “10,000-step meter”. The number 10,000? It just ”felt” good. And now it feels good to Fitbit et al. theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/sep/03/watch-your-step-why-the-10000-daily-goal-is-built-on-bad-science?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 6 Retweets ❤️ 9 Favorites 2020 Jan 6 Mood +6 🙂

…in reply to @axbom
More debunked behavioral truths. Under scrutiny: Loss Aversion. "The popular idea that avoiding losses is a bigger motivator than achieving gains is not supported by the evidence" via JesperBylund blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/why-the-most-important-idea-in-behavioral-decision-making-is-a-fallacy/
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 13 Favorites 2020 Jan 16 Mood -3 🙁

…in reply to @axbom
A paper mill is a company that fabricates scientific papers on demand. They sell these to people who need to have a scientific paper published in an international journal. MicrobiomDigest and team found >400 papers seemingly part of a mill. scienceintegritydigest.com/2020/02/21/the-tadpole-paper-mill/ ht beantin
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 9 Favorites 2020 Feb 22 Mood -1 🙁

…in reply to @axbom
'Stockholm syndrome' is a misogynistic invention by a psychiatrist who found his authority questioned. And which was then popularised by the media. As explained by jessradio in her book about domestic abuse: 'See What You Made Me Do'. sezmohammed/1252500993972948992?s=20 t.co/DKyYrXdG1g
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 10 Retweets ❤️ 18 Favorites 2020 Jul 25 Mood -3 🙁

…in reply to @axbom
This tweet was detached from the thread. Adding it here so you don't miss it. axbom/1237099412515684352?s=21 axbom/1237099412515684352
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 3 Favorites 2020 Jul 25 Mood +1 🙂

…in reply to @axbom
Interesting and relevant recent interview with rcbregman, author of Humankind - on mehdirhasan's Deconstructed. They talk about some of the problematic experiments mentioned earlier in this thread (Stanford Prison, Milgram) and more. overcast.fm/+dcvDvcqYc
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 2 Favorites 2020 Jul 25 Mood 0

…in reply to @axbom
Also mentioned in the Deconstructed podcast is how the fictional(!) Golding book Lord of the Flies has contributed to ideas of inevitable human destructive behavior. This story shows another, real-life, outcome: theguardian.com/books/2020/may/09/the-real-lord-of-the-flies-what-happened-when-six-boys-were-shipwrecked-for-15-months
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 4 Favorites 2020 Jul 25 Mood -3 🙁

…in reply to @axbom
”Studies in top science, psychology and economics journals that fail to hold up when others repeat them are cited, on average, more than 100 times as often in follow-up papers than work that stands the test of time.” theguardian.com/science/2021/may/21/research-findings-that-are-probably-wrong-cited-far-more-than-robust-ones-study-finds?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 12 Favorites 2021 May 22 Mood 0

…in reply to @axbom
Keeping an eye on machine learning papers. random_walker/1422222355296829441
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 2 Favorites 2021 Aug 3 Mood 0

…in reply to @axbom
Sometimes replication is impossible because the original study is based on fake data. This debunking of Dan Ariely studies (yes, plural - read the full article) is worth your time. buzzfeednews.com/article/stephaniemlee/dan-ariely-honesty-study-retraction
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 2 Retweets ❤️ 2 Favorites 2021 Aug 25 Mood 0

…in reply to @axbom
"Something is wrong with science that’s causing established results to fail. One proposed and long overdue remedy has been an overhaul of the use of statistics." m.nautil.us/issue/74/networks/the-flawed-reasoning-behind-the-replication-crisis
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 3 Favorites 2021 Nov 28 Mood -4 🙁

…in reply to @axbom
This long-read by aubreyclayton on how statistics and eugenics are intertwined is the perfect addition to this multi-year thread on misleading science. Highly recommended. via mer__edith m.nautil.us/issue/92/frontiers/how-eugenics-shaped-statistics
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 5 Favorites 2021 Nov 28 Mood +2 🙂

…in reply to @axbom
"An eight-year-long study reveals that only about half of early-stage cancer experiments are able to produce the same results as the initial experiment." smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/its-difficult-to-replicate-cancer-research-a-new-report-details-180979187/
Permalink On twitter.com 2021 Dec 12 Mood -1 🙁